Raymond
was telling me about the ethnographic poems that his students are going to have
to write soon for the methods in- / introduction to- ethnography class he’s
teaching this semester, and I thought ethnography poems sounded intriguing, but
in continuing the conversation I discovered that Raymond has had his composition
students write poetry as well—and that he’s done this every time he’s taught
comp. Because I am working on this blog, his mention of poetry in composition
raised the stakes of the conversation for me (albeit imperceptibly to him, I
hope). Why does Raymond have students write poetry in comp? When in the
semester do they compose poetry? What prompting or guidelines does he supply?
How does he introduce this project, and how extensive a project is it? Here’s
the upshot.
Raymond
emphasized that we as instructors never know which of our students are
fantastic poets. He was less oriented toward making the case that composition should teach
poetry than he was toward underscoring the hiddenness of talent. For Raymond,
the fact that he doesn’t ever know which students are going to produce
knock-out poems is reason enough to prod them into it. I’m not sure this
reasoning suffices—should I give my comp students the opportunity to butcher a
moose? So that unknown meatcutter extraordinaires will discover themselves?—but
Raymond’s idea here is connected to a basic pedagogical perspective of his,
too, which is that research accumulates into knowledge that has an emotional
dimension.
In practice, Raymond has assigned
introductory poems at the start of the semester, the form of which are already
set out (line beginnings/topics, etc.). But it gets more involved with artistry
later in the semester: part of his students’ research papers involve a poetic
component, partly to revitalize their investment in their topics, and partly to
give life to an aspect of their developing knowledge that might not find
expression in academic writing. To prep for this, Raymond assigns his students
an article by Art Young, “Writing Across and Against the Curriculum.” He then
gives no guidelines regarding length or form (although when I pressed him on
this he said that yes, free verse is what he exposes them to and expects them
to produce, but also that he emphasizes to students that “the form the poem
wants to be is the form that [he] want[s] it to take”). Raymond has found
further guidelines to be unnecessary: students produce “serious poems” he says,
“consistently.” They also have to read their poetry in front of the class,
about which Raymond is all smiles—many students slam, or adopt a performance
element in some respect, and the class is always stunned by a few of the poems,
as well as by which of their classmates produced the truly moving pieces.
No comments:
Post a Comment